New dataset on EMI – Data on metering configurations

  • Last post 12 January 2023
Matthew Keir posted this 02 October 2016

Agents, third parties, and new entrant retailers have asked for information about metering configurations at ICPs throughout the country. These parties are investing in systems and processes, and it’s helpful for them to know all of the options up front rather than discovering each unique configuration one-by-one as they engage with consumers or use the ICP connection data API.

We’ve released a file detailing unique metering configurations at ICPs and the number of ICPs with each configuration. This information is provided at meter register level for any active meter in the registry at any installation at active ICPs. The register information is provided as a space delimited list with energy flow direction, register content code, and period of availability. More information can be found in the registry functional specification.

The file will be updated and released with other retail reports each month. As with all files in the datasets folders, they are also accessible via our FTP site.

  • Liked by
  • jofajafa
  • JessielGonzalez
Order by: Standard | Newest | Votes
Ron Beatty posted this 06 April 2017

Apologies for the delay in replying to this post. Most of the combinations listed above are incorrect, we are investigating these along with a few others currently.

  • Liked by
  • msouness
  • jofajafa
jofajafa posted this 19 September 2017

Shouldn't there be business rules to prevent creation in the registry of meaningless content codes such as CN-24 or N-24? There's a great deal of unnecessary complexity in wading through so many different configurations when some combinations are invalid.

  • Liked by
  • msouness
  • Clive Gifford
Nicole Gagnon posted this 19 September 2017

We are currently consulting on proposed changes to the register content codes and how they are updated/used in the registry. All submissions are welcome, the closing date is Friday 29 September. Details are on our consultation page.

  • Liked by
  • msouness
  • jofajafa
Matthew Keir posted this 25 October 2017

Hi Clive,

Thank you for making us aware of this. The September files are now available.

We had a small issue occur in our data warehouse that happened to coincide with the automated processing that runs after the 10th business day each month. We hadn’t realised this had impacted any published files. This issue impacted all the monthly files published in retail datasets, not only the metering configurations file.

One of the reasons EMI exists is to support users to provide informed consultation responses. It’s great to hear that you’re making use of this information in this way.

To be clear, the files are published after the 10th business day - this is not always the 15th of each month.




  • Liked by
  • jofajafa
  • Clive Gifford
msouness posted this 28 October 2019

Relocated meter register conversation to new discussion


  • Liked by
  • Matthew Keir
  • jofajafa
msouness posted this 01 February 2017

Is there any good reason for having 1580 I flow registers allocated against UN / D / N etc content codes?

  • Liked by
  • jofajafa
Matthew Keir posted this 24 February 2017

No - after looking into this, there is no good reason. This is an MEP compliance issue - I'll pass it to the right people internally.

For injection meter registers can only be:

  • I-7304-24 (with an HHR profile code populated by the trader), or;
  • I-EG-24 (with a PV1 or EG1 profile code populated by the trader)

Zero is not a valid period of availability. A UN register content code must always be 24. If the register is programmed or exists it should show in the registry. However, observing this in the registry data would not tell you if that channel was connected to any actual load (or any injection source), to see this you'd need to look at the consumption data for the ICP.

There is no report that lists the numbers of separate installations or separate meters installed behind ICPs that are held in the registry. We thought the most value was captured by reporting register details of all installations and meters at each ICP - and how common these arrangements are. Other meters at ICPs that are not used for reconciliation won't have details held in the registry.

If you can explain a bit more about the value in this we would consider this.

  • Liked by
  • msouness
msouness posted this 26 February 2017

For these combinations I have to scratch my head a bit:

X-EG-24 (generation, but not into the network???)
X-UN-18 (uncontrolled, but not available for more than 18 h per day???)
X-N-24 (a really long night?)
X-N-20 (night lasts 20 h per day?)
X-NC-24 (night register, fully controlled, but not controlled?)
X-CN-24 (controlled but available 24h per day?)

To a lesser extent, the following appear to be a bit odd:

X-SENW-10 (10 hours weekdays, 24 h weekend)
X-SEOP-18 (7.5 h per weekday)
X-SEOP-24 (7.5 h per weekday)
X-SEPK-24 (6.5 h per weekday)
X-SWDD-24 (weekday day)
X-SWDN-24 (weekday night)
X-SWDPK-24 (8 h per weekday)
X-SWED-24 (day weekend)
X-SWEN-24 (night weekend)
X-WD-8 (day is 8 hours only?)
X-WDOP-24 (off peak is 24 hours a day?)
X-WE-8 (the weekend only has 8 hours per day?)
X-WWDD-24 (winter weekday day is 24 h - what about night?)
X-WWDN-24 (winter weekday night is 24 h - what about day?)
X-WWDPK-24 (peak period is all day?)
X-WWED-24 (winter weekend day is 24h? - what about night?)
X-WWEN-24 (winter weekend night is 24h? - what about day?)
X-NC-20 (can night be 20h?)


  • Liked by
  • jofajafa
msouness posted this 18 June 2017

I'm interested in finding out how many meters are deployed that are redundant due to legacy channels no longer being used.

  • Liked by
  • jofajafa
msouness posted this 08 October 2017

It’s certainly time for some consolidation of register content codes and hours of availability. How many networks cut different tariff rates for different hours of availability for controlled load registers?

  • Liked by
  • jofajafa
Clive Gifford posted this 25 October 2017

Can one of the Authority staff please explain why there is no October update of the metering configurations file published yet.

Has this been delayed or postponed, perhaps wishing to avoid the effects of "garbage in, garbage out" as alluded to in the submission I made concerning register content codes, including thousands of non-existent meters and their associated register content codes, at least on TLC's network?

As of today, 26 October 2017, the last update was on 15 September. I understood an update was published on the 15th of each month.


  • Liked by
  • jofajafa
msouness posted this 28 February 2018

Hi Matt,

Is there a new location for the meter configuration dataset?

  • Liked by
  • jofajafa
Matthew Keir posted this 11 October 2018

Hi Malcolm,

Thanks for the note.

Just to be clear where this conversion issue is occurring - are you suggesting MEPs are populating the registry with serial numbers after opening in excel, and that what is causing this issue?

We're still pushing for improvements to reduce incompatible meter configuration information.





  • Liked by
  • msouness
jofajafa posted this 20 June 2019

"Anyone have a good reason for the content code EG20 to be in Registry?"

It's disappointing that not only has the morass of legacy CC/POA combinations - many combinations of which as Malcolm has demonstrated are nonsensical - not been tidied up, but there apparently are no validation rules to limit the creation of new redundant combinations.

  • Liked by
  • msouness
msouness posted this 01 October 2019

Great to see significant improvement of register content codes:

  56 I Flow non- EG (or 730x)

  374 I flow EG with less than 24h

  148 X flow EG24

  70 X flow non uncontrolled with 24h

  161 0h registers

However IN24 is still substantial at 316,902 registers.

  • Liked by
  • jofajafa
Show more posts